Quote:
Originally Posted by D.K
Might be harsh but I reckon that Lee is past it. ONly 12 months ago he was up there as the number 1 paceman, now struggles to get it up over 145. That is how he got his wickets, with the pace. hardly moves it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mas cambios
To move off topic for a post and talk about Lee.
It seems that age (and possibly previous injuries) is catching up with him, hence the reduction in top speed (and being able to sustain it for any length of time). As others have said pace is his main weapon; without it he is nothing more than a decent bowler.
You'd have thought that he'd be working on moving the ball both in the air and off the seam as this would be really effective at his current pace and more than likely prolong his career a good few years. The difference between Lee and the true great fast men is that the greats adapted their bowling as they got older, Lee hasn't done that for me at the moment.
|
His wife leaving him wouldn't have helped either. I think he needs to given some more time to assess where he's really at. The breakdown of his marriage was rather public and it has obviously had an effect on his performances (which it generally would with any player). This all happened immediately before the tour of India began so it wasn't at a great time for him.
Lee's only had one bad series and the series against South Africa is not even a test old. Writing him off after small period of downturn is a little harsh.
My order would be this:
1. Steyn
2. Zaheer Khan
3. Ntini
4. Johnson
5. O'Brien
I don't rate Sharma. O'Brien's last 30 wickets have cost 20.47 (20.4666 recurring) per wicket.