moist milk
New Member
underachieving greatly
Panton Hill?
- Thread starter moist milk
- Start date
bestgameintheworld
Member
your joking aren't you, they have two and a half players, Moch, fordy and grimshaw when he can be bothered, the rest are only average at best. depth is the key and they ain't got it, at least they don't give up. interesting next three years for the club could go the way of whittlesea. tough end of town, both them and hurstbridge struggling.
batting allrounder
<strong>DVCA Top Poster - September '09</strong>
I do feel a bit for Panton Hill.
They are a small country town in an old area.
There juniors aren't the best as a result of this. When they do produce good juniors such as Sanderson and Rushton in recent years they leave the club.
They are a small country town in an old area.
There juniors aren't the best as a result of this. When they do produce good juniors such as Sanderson and Rushton in recent years they leave the club.
Tongs
Well-Known Member
100% agree, you can't dislike Panton Hill and they are in trouble due to the area that they are in, they aren't going to get massive crowds of people pouring in to play cricket and would be twice as hard to attract players from other clubs.
Under achieving is stupid comment from an ignorant person!
sam_j_adams
Member
Yes, a proud club struggling in an area that isn't overly populated.
But at least they didn't go out and buy players like another club in Money Shield that is staring relegation right in the eyes.
But at least they didn't go out and buy players like another club in Money Shield that is staring relegation right in the eyes.
bestgameintheworld
Member
your club never taken a player from another club and paid them?