Should Ricky Ponting be Sacked
A very good article that highlights alot of ways ponting seems to work. Its a good read and well worth the time. It brings me to the point, Should Ricky Ponting be sacked? If so who should take over?
Somebody, probably a preschool teacher, needs to explain simply to Ricky Ponting about the damage that has been caused by his team during the Sydney Test. While India burns and fumes over issues ranging from race to umpiring and sportsmanship, Ponting continues to believe his team has done nothing wrong.
It is extraordinary that he doesn't understand the significance of India's threat to boycott the tour or Australia's direct and indirect roles in the lead-up to it. He is as temporarily blind as some of the officials were at the SCG.
On a day when there was a call for Ponting, Australia's most successful captain, to be sacked, his only concession was that he would sit down with Anil Kumble and talk about the situation "if Anil thinks that is necessary". "But I'd be really surprised if he thought it was."
If it's necessary? At the time Ponting was speaking to the Australian the entire tour was in doubt. A day earlier Kumble had accused Australia of not playing in the spirit of the game, an insult that should be even more damaging than "monkey" or "**************" to any self-respecting cricketer. Obviously it's not to Ponting, who remains convinced the match was played hard, fairly and properly.
READ THE REST Here http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/current/story/329708.html
A very good article that highlights alot of ways ponting seems to work. Its a good read and well worth the time. It brings me to the point, Should Ricky Ponting be sacked? If so who should take over?