Haig will play finals and from there could be very st albans like. gun fast bowler. pretty average and standard batting line up. They need to bowl good sides out for under 150 to be a chance, but will smash the bottom sides.
Pacco have picked up a couple from north melbourne but only lower...
Yep also heard this, from all I've heard they look to be trying to form a close bond between footy and cricket. Who knows it may work wonders as they won the edfl b grade footy grand final quite easily... There's a few good cricketers from other clubs such as greenvale, glenroy, and craigieburn...
North A - St Albans, Laverton will play finals in first season in A1
West B - Almost got to go with Altona as it hasn't got the most successful clubs in there
North B - Craigieburn. Not playing much opposition either and have been cooped up in North B for a while now
Agreed district 3s and 4s is still strong as you are playing against good, young kids (generally) who are looking for an opportunity to push to bigger and better things. The coaching is the biggest plus of this and results in not only seeing the improvement in player games (bowling/batting) but...
Finally someone makes some sense.
The difference a year with much more credible and excelled coaches as well as turf training facilities is fantastic.
Not every vtca or local club has the chance to play all 4 sides on turf and/or train on turf facilities.
District cricket offers so much more...
yes all it takes is a bit of preparation and persistence.
Sounds like hussler doesn't have any idea about any cricket besides what he currently competes in which is irrelevant in this thread if its true his club is not even involved in the vtca
Go to any successful local club and check out how far and high they let their juniors go only to reap the rewards in the future... It doesn't make a difference if the kids make it a district level its about having a crack and seeing how far they can go. There is no using!!! District clubs need...
So do you or husler have a clue about district cricket? It really doesn't sound like it buddy. Your kidding yourself if you think your opinion is correct and if it was once it defiantly isn't now
you are an absolute idiot you must be getting your club no where.
Yes you never said anything in your original post about 13-15 yr olds but I did in my first few posts and you argued with those.
Get a clue mate I hope you have nothing to do with the young kids at your local club
your an idiot.
the point we have been making on here is that 3s and 4s subbies is great for 13 and 14 and 15 yr olds as it gives turf cricket oppourtunity.
and if you've ever had anything to do with a district cricket club that fact is most kids playing 3s and 4s are probably no different to...
haha get a clue buddy.
first of all, cricketers never get used at a district clubs. if they make runs in the 3s and 4s they progress simple.
Local cricket clubs should be pushing their juniors to play higher. After all this is what junior cricket is for not to progress kids to your seniors in...
thats spot on from what i know.
I think there should only be the bottom of the ladder relegated and grand final winner pushed up rather than 2 up 2 down can be a bit harsh
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.