I would argue that any ‘wide’ that is hit by a batsman is debatable. When you’re only made aware an hour after a change of innings that it was actually scored as a wide, then at what point should you alert the umpires?
There was never an argument that Rosanna themselves scored any more runs...
Technically Epping’s score should have been 139 if only 6 legal deliveries were scored however the non-wide and surplus legal delivery which accounted for 2 runs pushed their total to 142. The extra legal delivery and resulting runs cannot be disputed by the laws of the game, but a clerical...
The scorers waited to see how many balls were bowled in the over, the extra ball would in theory confirm the wide. There was a 7th legal delivery bowled in the over (which ended up being a no ball and 1 off the bat) so the scorers believed that would confirm the earlier wide call. What this...
Interesting one. There was a questionable umpiring/scoring decision during the Epping innings. A ball was bowled by Shelton which was hit by the batsman. The umpire made an unusual gesture with his arms which the scorers thought was potentially indicating a wide. The scorers counted the wide and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.