In: Rogers, Out: Arnberger
- Thread starter Jonesy
- Start date
MasterBlaster
New Member
Re: In: Rogers, Out: Arnberger
Why did Rogers leave Western Australia for Melbourne?
Why did Rogers leave Western Australia for Melbourne?
jimmy33
New Member
Re: In: Rogers, Out: Arnberger
Well they get ranked by their 5 day worth, Test contenders receive a slightly higher value in the rankings, with a rating of 1.25 for every place on the scale, starting at 20 and increasing with each step to No. 1, while one-day players earn one point per position. The numbers are then combined to determine the top 25.
Oh and whos Arnberger?
Well they get ranked by their 5 day worth, Test contenders receive a slightly higher value in the rankings, with a rating of 1.25 for every place on the scale, starting at 20 and increasing with each step to No. 1, while one-day players earn one point per position. The numbers are then combined to determine the top 25.
Oh and whos Arnberger?
MasterBlaster
New Member
Re: In: Rogers, Out: Arnberger
Why do you have to change teams to get noticed? Are the selectors biased or is the quality of cricket low at Western Australia that the players are not taken seriously?
Why do you have to change teams to get noticed? Are the selectors biased or is the quality of cricket low at Western Australia that the players are not taken seriously?
jimmy33
New Member
Re: In: Rogers, Out: Arnberger
Actually there is Cameron White, Brad Hodge and David Hussey. So they don't have 'none'. The reason he moved was because he wasn't getting any One Day action, thus putting him at a disadvantage for a contract, and the other reason is that he didn't like the WACA head honcho. That probably stemmed from not playing many one dayers. Frankly he couldn't crack the one day squad most of the time, and the games he did play he was crap. His highest was like 20 from 40 balls or something
Actually there is Cameron White, Brad Hodge and David Hussey. So they don't have 'none'. The reason he moved was because he wasn't getting any One Day action, thus putting him at a disadvantage for a contract, and the other reason is that he didn't like the WACA head honcho. That probably stemmed from not playing many one dayers. Frankly he couldn't crack the one day squad most of the time, and the games he did play he was crap. His highest was like 20 from 40 balls or something
jimmy33
New Member
Re: In: Rogers, Out: Arnberger
Actually a contracted player is a contracted player. They are not separated into ODI's and Test players. Those squads are just for the upcoming Carribean tour, not for the entire 12 months, although in fairness, it is unlikely that the squads will change a lot during that time.
Actually a contracted player is a contracted player. They are not separated into ODI's and Test players. Those squads are just for the upcoming Carribean tour, not for the entire 12 months, although in fairness, it is unlikely that the squads will change a lot during that time.
jimmy33
New Member
Re: In: Rogers, Out: Arnberger
Maybe none of them have been good enough. In fairness, how many South Australians have been playing, 1. And he hasn't played 5 Tests. The fact is that there is no bias against Victorians. Back in the day it was dominated by Victorians. Almost every Australian domestic player, no matter how good, has struggled to make it into the International team.
Maybe none of them have been good enough. In fairness, how many South Australians have been playing, 1. And he hasn't played 5 Tests. The fact is that there is no bias against Victorians. Back in the day it was dominated by Victorians. Almost every Australian domestic player, no matter how good, has struggled to make it into the International team.