swghayward79
Member
Play two wicket keepers in a match...
I saw a really good idea on the 606 boards on the BBC. Teams should play two batsman\wicket keepers so that the guy who had batted for least time is the one who takes the gloves so that he is less tired and therefore more alert.
it seems a good idea, have the freshest bloke behind the stumps so that hopefully less chances will go down and if someone is having a bad day you can still change it. i guess you would need to have at least one of them able to average more than 40 but i think it could be the way forward in test cricket
I saw a really good idea on the 606 boards on the BBC. Teams should play two batsman\wicket keepers so that the guy who had batted for least time is the one who takes the gloves so that he is less tired and therefore more alert.
it seems a good idea, have the freshest bloke behind the stumps so that hopefully less chances will go down and if someone is having a bad day you can still change it. i guess you would need to have at least one of them able to average more than 40 but i think it could be the way forward in test cricket
Unlike batting/bowling all rounders, wicketkeepers cannot rest or hide while fielding.
If you tire out the 'keeper by letting him (or wanting him to) bat for 4 or more hours then why are you surprised when they are take the field and are sloppy.
If you want to strengthen the batting why not take the radical approach of playing 2 wicketkeeper batsmen and after batting, make the player who is less tired (i.e. less successful with the bat) start behind the stumps?
I happen to think that the wicketkeeper does more in the fielding innings than any other player (bowlers included) and so should focus on this important role.