shashivardhan
Active Member
the drs controversy has a talk in the second test of ashes too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're not a programmer, are you?It is simple really. All teams must use it and you simply design a program to make the decision and get rid of the third umpire. Last night would not have happened, the computer would have said not out as there was no hot spot, no snicko, no deviation. I maintain, someone did very well out of that decision.
An algorithm could also make that decision in seconds so every decision could be electronic and a tool the umpire can use. The team challenge is ok but all teams have shown poor judgement of how to use it.
You're not a programmer, are you?
This is the second typo I've seen in a Melbournian newspaper article in recent days. Strange.There has also long been a feeling spectators are also being short-changed by time-wasting tactics sich as slow over-rates.
Something I hate about the current system is the simulated representation of the ball that's just been bowled. Why show the ball hitting the stumps and then say it is missing the stumps. There is a leeway of half a ball. If the ball isn't hitting by more than half a ball and will therefore be deemed to miss the stumps, show it missing the stumps.
Yep, pretty much this. I can't understand how if the ball hits the stumps it can be either out or not out depending on what the umpire's call is for that particular decision. Surely if the ball is hitting the stumps (even if only by a few millimetres) then it's hitting the stumps and therefore has to be out?
The way the result is shown on the screen makes no sense.
On the tennis, in the ball is in they show it in. If it is out they show it out. How hard is that?