To walk or not to walk?

Top Contributors
Re: To walk or not to walk?

i dont think even gilchrist who people claim is a walker would walk in a situation like that. i dont believe that gilchrist is a walker he might have walked because of some misunderstanding. has he ever walked except in the 2003 world cup?
 
Re: To walk or not to walk?

You weigh up the situation and then act appropriately.

I normally walk but sometimes you just not sure if you've hit or not so let the umpire decide, although my winning smile works in my favour here.

As for the pro's, well, some will, some won't, depends on what is riding on the match.

That said some clowns make a rod for their own back by mouthing off to the press, a'la Ritchie B. way back in the day and he had to walk even though he missed the ball by a mile.
 
Re: To walk or not to walk?

You walk regardless, lets withhold the tradition of the game.

If you stand your ground then you are nothing but a bounder and don't deserve to be on the field.
 
Re: To walk or not to walk?

It is good to be honest so we should walk if we get out. If we are honest then the umpire will also respect us and give the benefit of the doubt.
 
Re: To walk or not to walk?

nonet101 said:
You walk regardless, lets withhold the tradition of the game.

If you stand your ground then you are nothing but a bounder and don't deserve to be on the field.
Click to expand...

Don't be so preciouis, sweet pea. It's not 1910 anymore, I expect you still rock the joint with a flannel shirt?
 
Re: To walk or not to walk?

nonet101 said:
You walk regardless, lets withhold the tradition of the game.

If you stand your ground then you are nothing but a bounder and don't deserve to be on the field.
Click to expand...
walking is not my thing. you may call it cheating but you dont get punished for it so its not really cheating
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top