using bat and pad
hi, I have been away from the game for a few years. I have restarted my club career and am enjoying to be back.
Last Saturday I was new to the crease. To weigh up the pitch I decided to be cautious initially. A length delivey came from a slow/medium pacer and I took a huge stride forward, with bat and pad. It hit me on the front toe in line with stumps.
To my suprise the umpire signalled LBW. I thought that if you took a large stride forward, it was hard to be sure if the ball's height and line would hit the stumps.
I am now not sure whether to play forward defence, with bat and pad. When I ask on the decision, a lot of people say that now adays if it hits you on the full you will be given, irrespective of a big forward stride.
A lot of people say I should not be given because the umpire can't be sure on line and height, due to large stride.
Does anyone know what umpires make of this these days. I would be grateful because I know the forward defence could be a risky shot.
hi, I have been away from the game for a few years. I have restarted my club career and am enjoying to be back.
Last Saturday I was new to the crease. To weigh up the pitch I decided to be cautious initially. A length delivey came from a slow/medium pacer and I took a huge stride forward, with bat and pad. It hit me on the front toe in line with stumps.
To my suprise the umpire signalled LBW. I thought that if you took a large stride forward, it was hard to be sure if the ball's height and line would hit the stumps.
I am now not sure whether to play forward defence, with bat and pad. When I ask on the decision, a lot of people say that now adays if it hits you on the full you will be given, irrespective of a big forward stride.
A lot of people say I should not be given because the umpire can't be sure on line and height, due to large stride.
Does anyone know what umpires make of this these days. I would be grateful because I know the forward defence could be a risky shot.