CowCorner
Member
So if someone could please explain how "some people" have gone against wishes and intenet it would be appreciated. As for agendas, there may be a hidden one somewhere for person/s, i don't know. That's why we will have the right to ask questions at the AGM......
The DVCA carries on as normal from this point on - I agree that if the executive or members thereof do not share the same vision of the clubs, then clubs have every vote to refrain from electing any particualar person they feel does not represent their club wishes.
As is i said at the presidents meeting, if this was a common feeling amongst clubs, we should have got on the front foot early, been united and knocked this on the head before it gathered any more momentum. If one thing, at least the clubs fully understand how important it is to communcate with each other, which can only be a long term benefit.
We may not like the "message" but i think it's wrong to attribute all blame to the "messengers" who were elected to represent us and did so on this issue with the knowledge of all clubs.
I have heard that some will stand down which indicates to me that they are unhappy with the way the clubs have gone on this. Why would they be unhappy? Yes they where there on the steering committee and to represent us...so why be upset, should being on that committee gain info and report back to us with information for our voting?? Why resign?
If they where the 'messengers' then after finding out that the clubs do not what NCL they will happily stay on the Exec and we move on with out incident.......thats IF they are only 'messengers'.