Is Sachin Tendulkar A Fraud?

Sharkman84

Active Member
Sachin Tendulkar attacks Ricky Ponting and Adam Gilchrist in new book

  • BEN HORNE
  • THE COURIER-MAIL
  • NOVEMBER 06, 2014 10:09AM
SACHIN Tendulkar has accused former Australian captain Ricky Ponting of contributing to the 2008 ‘Monkeygate’ affair being blown out of proportion.

As expected, the release of the retiring Indian great’s autobiography, ‘Playing it my way’, has revealed further attacks from Tendulkar on some of Australian cricket’s biggest names.

It sets the tone for more tension when India arrive for the upcoming four-match Test series starting at the Gabba on December 4.


In an early extract, Tendulkar slammed former Indian coach Greg Chappell, but the run-scoring machine has written in detail about the 2007-2008 Monkeygate controversy which centred around an alleged racial slur from Harbhajan Singh directed at Australian all-rounder Andrew Symonds.

Tendulkar has confirmed the Indian side was set to walk out on the tour following a three-match suspension imposed on Harbhajan by match referee Mike Proctor after the alleged incident in the Sydney Test.

Australian players were incensed at the time that Tendulkar stood by Singh, and in his autobiography, the little master has refused to back down.

Tendulkar said he was left fuming at the insinuation he was lying through the inquiry, which ultimately resulted in the ICC overturning Harbhajan’s ban and the Indians continuing the tour.

According to Tendulkar, Harbhajan said ‘Teri maa ki’ (a northern Indian expression which means ‘Your mother’ …) to Symonds, rather than calling him a monkey.

Australian captain Ponting, should have discussed the incident with Indian counterpart Anil Kumble first rather than reporting the matter straight to Procter, according to Tendulkar.

“What surprised me most was the haste with which the Australians had lodged their complaint,” Tendulkar wrote, admitting that he later found out the two cricketing boards had told the captains to report any allegations of racial discrimination to the match referee.

“Even so, I still believe that the matter would not have been blown so out of proportion if Ponting had discussed it with the captain Anil Kumble, Harbhajan and the Indian team management before reporting the incident to Mike Procter, the match referee.

“In turn, Mike Procter could also have handled the matter with a little more sensitivity.

“I must reiterate we were very serious about the boycott … and we were fully prepared to accept the consequences of walking out on the tour, knowing that such an action might have resulted in the ICC banning the Indian team.”

Tendulkar said the mood of the series changed in that Sydney Test and accused Australian wicketkeeper Adam Gilchrist of double standards in appealing for a catch that hadn’t touched Rahul Dravid’s bat.

Gilchrist was known for walking before the umpire’s decision when batting, but Tendulkar has questioned whether the Australian great really thought Dravid was out when he appealed.

“Mind you, there is little doubt in my mind that we would have drawn had it not been for what seemed to us to be mistakes by the umpires and some rather unsportsmanlike conduct by a few of the Australian players.”

“Rahul Dravid was given out caught behind off Symonds for 38 by umpire Bucknor when his bat seemed to be a fair distance away from the ball. The wicket-keeper Adam Gilchrist was standing up to the stumps at the time and was in the best position to see if the ball had touched Rahul’s bat,” Tendulkar recalled.

“Yet he, who prided himself on walking off if he nicked the ball, appealed for the caught-behind and to our disbelief we saw the umpire raise the finger. It was a shocking decision. Some of us actually wondered if Rahul had been given out lbw.”

Tendulkar also had a shot at current Australian captain Michael Clarke and Ponting for appealing for a “grassed” catch off Sourav Ganguly as the Sydney Test heated up.

Ganguly was given out unfairly according to the Indians, who felt they were copping the rough end of the stick from umpires.

“Michael Clarke and Ricky Ponting decided to appeal for what we thought was a grassed catch at slip,” he wrote.

“Finally, umpire Bucknor gave Dhoni out leg-before when to us the ball would clearly have missed the stumps.

“It seemed that every decision that could go against us had done so.”

This is not the first time Tendulkar and Gilchrist have locked horns over matters of sportsmanship.

In his 2008 autobiography True Colours, Gilchrist took aim at the Indian great.

“In the Australian mentality, we play it hard and are then quick to shake hands and leave it all on the field,” Gilchrist wrote. “Some of our opponents don’t do it that way. Sachin Tendulkar, for instance, can be hard to find for a changing room handshake after we have beaten India. Harbhajan can also be hard to find.”

Gilchrist also accused Tendulkar of changing his story when providing testimony at the Monkeygate hearing.

“Tendulkar, who’d said at the first hearing that he hadn’t been able to hear what Harbhajan had said - and he was a fair way away, up the other end, so I’m certain he was telling the truth - now supported Harbhajan’s version that he hadn’t called Symo a ‘monkey’ but instead a Hindi term of abuse that might sound like ‘monkey’ to Australian ears,” Gilchrist wrote. “The Indians got him off the hook when they, of all people, should have been treating the matter of racial vilification with the utmost seriousness.”

Tendulkar later told Indian media: “Gilchrist called me up and clarified this issue. He said his comments had been taken out of context.”

Tendulkar also blasted Ian Chappell for criticising his form and urging him to retire back in 2007.

Chappell said Tendulkar should look at himself in the mirror, and the 41-year-old showed he can hold a grudge.

“I don’t think much about him (Ian). I showed him the size of the mirror in the VB Series (in Australia) in 2007.

“I don’t need to go out and prove to anyone.”

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...rist-in-new-book/story-fnp050m0-1227114204261
 
Sachin Tendulkar book: Indian great has been revealed as a political animal with shameless attacks on former opponents, says Robert Craddock

  • ROBERT CRADDOCK
  • THE COURIER-MAIL
  • NOVEMBER 06, 2014 10:00PM
IT’S been rumoured for years and now it’s confirmed. Sachin Tendulkar is not the person we thought he was.

After 25 years of bashful silence at last we have met the man behind the mask.

And what a ruthless force of nature he is.

Let’s just tell this straight.

Tendulkar, as confirmed in his just-released autobiography, is a highly political animal, a dangerous enemy who knew the bottomless power he possessed and used it shamelessly — and secretly — like a master puppeteer when it suited his team’s cause.

Tendulkar’s saintly public image was always the sum of how he looked, what he said and how he said it.

With a sweet, handsome face and smile that would melt a concrete slab, he always looked more lamb than lion as a man despite his great batting feats.

Align that to his boyish, high-pitched voice that always sounded so inoffensive and the fact that he barely expressed a strong opinion about any cricket matter in his 25-year career you might have Sachin neatly categorised as the choir boy who wandered on to a cricket field and decided to stay.

But when his autobiography was released worldwide on Thursday the choir boy ripped open his robes and pulled a loaded gun from a holster.

Tendulkar opened fire on Greg Chappell for allegedly trying to undermine Rahul Dravid; Michael Clarke and Ricky Ponting for appealing for a catch that wasn’t out; Adam Gilchrist for having double standards; Ian Chappell for urging him to retire and Australia in general for the Monkeygate scandal.

Far more significantly than all of these, he owned up to leading the rebellion which had his team insisting they should fly home if a suspension against Harbhajan Singh over the Monkeygate affair was not quashed (which it was).

This from a nation so outraged when the West Indies recently abandoned a tour of India.

Some felt Tendulkar played it smart.

He spent his international career saying next to nothing about anyone, creating as few problems as he could for himself and just went about batting ... batting ... and batting.

And then, when safely set up with pipe and slippers in retirement and with his key adversaries nowhere to be seen ... kapow!

But there is a sense of hollowness about his words. Shame he could not have unleashed his best punches when his opponents were in the ring with him.

It always sat oddly that Tendulkar’s lifelong hero is John McEnroe.

But those who know Tendulkar well used to say that Tendulkar loved McEnroe’s brain explosions because that was how he sometimes felt himself but he was never bold enough to reveal his inner self to the world.

Now he has done so. We may never think of him as kindly again but as least we got to meet the real man.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...-robert-craddock/story-fnp050m0-1227115097724

 
Oh man! For a change, I might buy a book and actually read it! lol

I fail to see the surprise in him having a nasty element to his personality. It's human nature. You can't score as many runs as he did without being a ****. Trust me, I know! lol

I've often thought Gilchrist's fair play reputation was exaggerated. Ok so he walked that one time. But in cricket, there are many moments that give you an opportunity to "cheat". It's natural to do that in cricket, because it's natural to do that anyway.

lol @ potting Ian Chappell. We all know Ian deserves a whack, the reason doesn't matter.

Robert Craddock is a bit of a wowser. He's a smei regular contributor to Kevin Bartlett's radio show in Melbourne. I'm rarely left with a higher opinion of him, when he speaks.
 
Is Sachin Tendulkar rewriting cricket history?

November 7, 2014 - 10:00PM


Having positioned itself to forge cricket's future, India is attempting something more ambitious: to forge its past.

Sachin Tendulkar, so warmly embraced in Bowral with his induction into the ICC Hall of Fame, managed to avoid the awkwardness that would have arisen had his opinions of some Australian cricketers been published a week earlier.

In his book Playing It My Way, Tendulkar has finally taken the chance, six years after the event, to give his version of Monkeygate, cricket's Freddy Krueger, its eternal zombie.

Recollections of that episode will inevitably have a degree of subjectivity, but an earlier extract from Tendulkar's book concerned a matter in which two of cricket's greats cannot both be telling the truth.

Greg Chappell coached India from 2005 to 2007. It was not a tranquil time, with Chappell pursuing his brief to challenge the senior players.

Explosively, Tendulkar writes, "Just months before the [2007] World Cup, Chappell had come to see me at home and, to my dismay, suggested that I should take over the captaincy from Rahul Dravid.

"Anjali [Tendulkar's wife], who was sitting with me, was equally shocked to hear him say that 'together, we could control Indian cricket for years', and that he would help me in taking over the reins of the side.

"I was surprised to hear the coach not showing the slightest amount of respect for the captain, with cricket's biggest tournament just months away. He stayed for a couple of hours, trying to convince me, before finally leaving."

This week, Chappell did not want to engage in "a war of words" with Tendulkar, but issued a statement through Cricket Australia: "I can state quite clearly that during my time as Indian coach I never contemplated Sachin replacing Rahul Dravid as captain. I was therefore very surprised to read the claims made in the book.

"During those years, I only ever visited Sachin's home once, and that was with our physio and assistant coach during Sachin's rehabilitation from injury, at least 12 months earlier than what was reported in the book. We enjoyed a pleasant afternoon together but the subject of captaincy was never raised."

There is a clearcut divergence between these recollections.

Four years ago, while working with Chappell on his book Fierce Focus, I read his diary. It was exhaustively detailed. Chappell wrote it for himself, not for publication. He has not consented to my raising it now. But he has, it seems, been traduced, and ought to be defended.

The diary records only one visit paid by Chappell to Tendulkar's home. It took place nearly a year before the World Cup, on May 9, 2006, the day before Chappell and Dravid were to take the Indian team to the West Indies for a Test and one-day tour.

Tendulkar was unavailable due to injury. Chappell was accompanied by physiotherapist John Gloster and Kiran More, the Indian chairman of selectors (not the assistant coach). Anjali Tendulkar was present.

According to the diary, they ate lunch and chatted about Tendulkar's recovery. Chappell was very supportive of Tendulkar. There is no mention of the captaincy. Why would there be? Chappell had recently been party to Dravid's elevation, in place of Sourav Ganguly.

Tendulkar was months away from playing. In private and in public, Chappell was placing unstinting faith in Dravid.

This is the meeting to which Chappell's statement refers. His diary records no other visit to Tendulkar's home.

Later, he wished that Tendulkar could have done more to rein in the unruly personalities in the team who were not respecting Dravid's authority, but never did Chappell imagine Tendulkar returning as captain. Indeed, Tendulkar had ruled himself out of leading India since his second unsuccessful stint in the job in 2000, long before Chappell's arrival.

So what's going on? Was there a second meeting? Conspiracy theorists might say Chappell doctored his own diary, to delete a meeting such as Tendulkar describes.

However, he would have needed to do this between 2007, when the diary was finished, and 2011, when I saw it.

As a diarist (as he was as a cricketer), Chappell was Pepys-like in his thoroughness. Every meeting, every practice session is accounted for. It beggars belief that he would tamper with his own private document in anticipation of a possible slanging match years in the future.

The other explanation is that Tendulkar's account is inaccurate. He may have misremembered, or been misquoted by his ghost writer. But he has not come out to say so.

The only conclusion is that he has done this deliberately. Why would he do that? Perhaps to win favour with Dravid, who, while not possessing Tendulkar's godlike status, has universal admiration and respect from cricketers of all nations for his unimpeachable integrity, a quality in which he is second to none.

There is a certain cruel logic by which Tendulkar should throw Chappell under a bus. By the end of his tenure after India's poor showing in the 2007 World Cup, Chappell was the convenient fall guy for all of India's problems.

If Tendulkar is referring to the first meeting and merely got the dates wrong, there are three witnesses: Tendulkar's wife, Gloster and More. It would be interesting to know what the independent parties recall, but the code of silence that India's power in cricket now exerts is a suffocating one. Chappell, an employee of Cricket Australia, is constrained from defending himself.

Similarly, on Monkeygate, Ricky Ponting's response to Tendulkar is bland: "I've got nothing to add to it because he is giving his side of events, [and] I've given my side of events in the past".

Over that incident as well, one side was telling the truth and the other was not, but the search for truth was rapidly buried by politics.

Tendulkar may be playing a dangerous game by challenging others to go public with what they really thought of his behaviour over the years. Or perhaps there is no danger at all.

Greatness on the field brings its own shield of invulnerability, and off-field, financial power adds a sword of intimidation. To fight for the truth is seen as too much bother, too difficult, too politically fraught. Too scary.


Cricket Australia has bowed its head to realpolitik before, and there is no sign that it will change course. But for as long as free speech is suppressed in public, private resentment will fester.

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket...ewriting-cricket-history-20141107-11hxwl.html
 
Have not yet read the book but based on the extracts in papers and on the net it would appear that Sachin is suffering the same problem many cricketers do. They have very bad memory for fact. It is always their way but never mind it makes good reading and a bit of controversy for the tour.

In the end Sachin like the other great batsman Bradman may well be ars$()les and maybe to be that good they had to. I note Gilly mentioning that he was always hard to find when they lost. No surprise, the Indians are the worst sportsmen in cricket with the most warped sense of morality. That was shown in the Monkeygate mess.
 
Last edited:
OH, is that Sachin down there at 22 on the all time averages??? I will give him long life in the game and compensate him to about 16th but the facts are clear. He came into the game far to young, stayed past his welcome and has now shown his poor character with his book. He sits behind Chappell, Kallis and Sangakkara but look at Hutton, Sutcliffe and Bradman, all on uncovered wickets. So careful with the stats they can bit you in the A#$E.

Highest averages
PlayerSpanMatInnsNORunsHSAve100500
DG Bradman (Aus)1928-1948528010699633499.9429137
RG Pollock (SA)1963-197023414225627460.977111
GA Headley (WI)1930-1954224042190270*60.831052
H Sutcliffe (Eng)1924-193554849455519460.7316232
E Paynter (Eng)1931-193920315154024359.23473
KC Sangakkara (SL)2000-2014128221171198831958.76375110
KF Barrington (Eng)1955-19688213115680625658.6720355
ED Weekes (WI)1948-195848815445520758.6115196
WR Hammond (Eng)1927-194785140167249336*58.4522244
GS Sobers (WI)1954-197493160218032365*57.78263012
JB Hobbs (Eng)1908-1930611027541021156.9415284
CL Walcott (WI)1948-196044747379822056.6815141
L Hutton (Eng)1937-19557913815697136456.6719335
Mominul Haque (Ban)2013-201412*223106718156.15371
JH Kallis (ICC/SA)1995-2013166280401328922455.37455816
GE Tyldesley (Eng)1921-19291420299012255.00362
CA Davis (WI)1968-197315295130118354.20441
VG Kambli (India)1993-199517211108422754.20433
Younis Khan (Pak)2000-20149416816820631353.98282815
GS Chappell (Aus)1970-198487151197110247*53.86243112
AD Nourse (SA)1935-195134627296023153.819143
SR Tendulkar (India)1989-20132003293315921248*53.78516814
 
OH, is that Sachin down there at 22 on the all time averages??? I will give him long life in the game and compensate him to about 16th but the facts are clear. He came into the game far to young, stayed past his welcome and has now shown his poor character with his book. He sits behind Chappell, Kallis and Sangakkara but look at Hutton, Sutcliffe and Bradman, all on uncovered wickets. So careful with the stats they can bit you in the A#$E.

Highest averages
PlayerSpanMatInnsNORunsHSAve100500
DG Bradman (Aus)1928-1948528010699633499.9429137
RG Pollock (SA)1963-197023414225627460.977111
GA Headley (WI)1930-1954224042190270*60.831052
H Sutcliffe (Eng)1924-193554849455519460.7316232
E Paynter (Eng)1931-193920315154024359.23473
KC Sangakkara (SL)2000-2014128221171198831958.76375110
KF Barrington (Eng)1955-19688213115680625658.6720355
ED Weekes (WI)1948-195848815445520758.6115196
WR Hammond (Eng)1927-194785140167249336*58.4522244
GS Sobers (WI)1954-197493160218032365*57.78263012
JB Hobbs (Eng)1908-1930611027541021156.9415284
CL Walcott (WI)1948-196044747379822056.6815141
L Hutton (Eng)1937-19557913815697136456.6719335
Mominul Haque (Ban)2013-201412*223106718156.15371
JH Kallis (ICC/SA)1995-2013166280401328922455.37455816
GE Tyldesley (Eng)1921-19291420299012255.00362
CA Davis (WI)1968-197315295130118354.20441
VG Kambli (India)1993-199517211108422754.20433
Younis Khan (Pak)2000-20149416816820631353.98282815
GS Chappell (Aus)1970-198487151197110247*53.86243112
AD Nourse (SA)1935-195134627296023153.819143
SR Tendulkar (India)1989-20132003293315921248*53.78516814
you can't compare players from different generations for example the 1930's were different to the 1990's-2014 that's the end of that.
 
Sorry nairbe. Aveages can be an indicator, but they're not the be all/end all. Sachie has a higher average than me, but I'm better than him.
and also on what type of roles they play for example ms dhoni having a one day average of 53 when his role is to finish that is incredible.
 
Sorry nairbe. Aveages can be an indicator, but they're not the be all/end all. Sachie has a higher average than me, but I'm better than him.

Ah yes, i do agree that statistics are limited in the holistic view of individual influence and this is to a great deal my point. 'Sri Lanka' I did compare him to contemporaries and he is still down the list but the matter of the batsmen in the pre-covered pitch era is not one to pass over. I would never consider Larwood to be any lesser a bowler than the current fasties and it would be folly to do so. Those elder statesmen of the game did some amazing things. Talk of pressure in the modern game, do you imagine the pressure on the players during the bodyline series. That was nationhood being tested not the latest contract with a bat sponsor.

I would use Jaques Kallis as a fine example. He was much more the gamesman, craftsman and engineer in the game Sachin ever was. Tendulkar was worshiped by India as a God and this alone was a prepostrophe of the actual exploits he managed. He was steady over a period that was exaggerated because he was marched into the game as the saviour of what was a joke team in the late eighties.

Kallis on the other hand was a good talent that came into the game at the right time and worked hard to build his team and his abilities over a long period. He was a great batsman, bowler fielder and statesman of his team, country and cricket. We can all see the effect that his retirement has had and he did it all as a mere mortal. i do consider him above Sachin, clearly.

In the end i do think Sachin was one of the greats of his era but was far from the cricketing God he was put up to be by India and the feeble minded media, rather he was a consistent player that managed the pressure well over his career but is now beginning to show that there has always been a divisive side that has not been good for Indian Cricket.
 


Will add a video of him tampering with the ball in South Africa. Tendulkar is overated in his own team Dravid and Laxman were far better batsmen than he was. Tendulkar is the most succesful brand in cricket designed and advertised to fool Indians and other funatics to shed their money to him and the Indian management!
 
Maybe he did tamper the ball but the records he has set is remarkable I only see one player in the whole world at the moment in track to beating his ODI record and thats virat kohli.

Had Brian Lara or Sobers or Bradman or Hutton or or or had played that amount of tests they would have exceeded his records and throw in a triple century also!
 
Had Brian Lara or Sobers or Bradman or Hutton or or or had played that amount of tests they would have exceeded his records and throw in a triple century also!
I would agree with Brian Lara but Bradman, Sobers or Hutton from different era's you can't compare them or predict what would happen and what would not.
 
Back
Top