NMCA 2019/2020

Top Contributors
All seems legit to me , As far as I'm aware ( happy to be corrected) none of those 3 have any links to the six clubs involved? If anything they'd be more inclined to side with the comp?
Well done to the 3 premiers, highest place teams won can't see any issue.

I'd doubt players would receive medals just a plaque to the club's one would think.
 
If true and 2 of those 3 ‘independent’ individuals were involved to deliberate the outcome then you don’t have to be Einstein to work out the value of the Premiership title is worthless. Bill & Phil would only need a can of free piss to influence their decision but then they are typical of this comp!Lucky the mafia are moving on as no doubt there would have been more to come.

Anyway hearing we still dont have enough umps for the season, anyone got anymore on this?
 
Pauline Hanson said:
If true and 2 of those 3 ‘independent’ individuals were involved to deliberate the outcome then you don’t have to be Einstein to work out the value of the Premiership title is worthless. Bill & Phil would only need a can of free piss to influence their decision but then they are typical of this comp!Lucky the mafia are moving on as no doubt there would have been more to come.

Anyway hearing we still dont have enough umps for the season, anyone got anymore on this?
Click to expand...
They were influenced by the rules. Wouldn’t be hard to comprehend if you read them.
 
None of those 3 have any links with socials in fact we've butted heads with Anderson in the past. Pauline sounds as bitter as the real racist red headed fish merchant.
 
Last edited:
Yep you winners are spot on...I am absolutely shattered and bitter that I/we cannot celebrate being ‘gifted’ a premiership for an event that didn’t occur. You enjoy your victory laps/drinks....not sure if more laughable or embarrassing but hey keep defending your 2020 titles!!
 
Pauline Hanson said:
Yep you winners are spot on...I am absolutely shattered and bitter that I/we cannot celebrate being ‘gifted’ a premiership for an event that didn’t occur. You enjoy your victory laps/drinks....not sure if more laughable or embarrassing but hey keep defending your 2020 titles!!
Click to expand...
Are you from one of the 3 teams on the other side of this verdict ?
 
Pauline Hanson said:
Yep you winners are spot on...I am absolutely shattered and bitter that I/we cannot celebrate being ‘gifted’ a premiership for an event that didn’t occur. You enjoy your victory laps/drinks....not sure if more laughable or embarrassing but hey keep defending your 2020 titles!!
Click to expand...
If you were in the position that the 3 teams who were awarded the premierships im sure your take on it would be different , dont you think ?
 
For the recorded we finished out of the top 4 as we do most seasons!

The comp needs to be brought to account on how and what has lead to them reversing their original decision after publicly declaring their position months ago of not awarding any title winners and then to arrive at this position is astounding.

If the 3 awarded clubs want to hang their hats on claiming the Premiership title, then GL to them.
 
Pauline Hanson said:
For the recorded we finished out of the top 4 as we do most seasons!

The comp needs to be brought to account on how and what has lead to them reversing their original decision after publicly declaring their position months ago of not awarding any title winners and then to arrive at this position is astounding.

If the 3 awarded clubs want to hang their hats on claiming the Premiership title, then GL to them.
Click to expand...
👍
 
Pauline Hanson said:
For the recorded we finished out of the top 4 as we do most seasons!

The comp needs to be brought to account on how and what has lead to them reversing their original decision after publicly declaring their position months ago of not awarding any title winners and then to arrive at this position is astounding.

If the 3 awarded clubs want to hang their hats on claiming the Premiership title, then GL to them.
Click to expand...
 
A decision 6 months later......Comp is the laughing stock. I don’t have an issue with the decision either way. But really..... its a wonder this comp is on the canvas & the panel is not independent. Make a decision according to the rules at the time, no issue with that. No rules have chance since. I think there are agendas all over the place. Cricket Vic can only fix the sinking ship.
 
bluehess said:
A decision 6 months later......Comp is the laughing stock. I don’t have an issue with the decision either way. But really..... its a wonder this comp is on the canvas & the panel is not independent. Make a decision according to the rules at the time, no issue with that. No rules have chance since. I think there are agendas all over the place. Cricket Vic can only fix the sinking ship.
Click to expand...
We have the”star” to fixing our problems now. In the STAR we trust.
 
bluehess said:
A decision 6 months later......Comp is the laughing stock. I don’t have an issue with the decision either way. But really..... its a wonder this comp is on the canvas & the panel is not independent. Make a decision according to the rules at the time, no issue with that. No rules have chance since. I think there are agendas all over the place. Cricket Vic can only fix the sinking ship.
Click to expand...
Don’t often post on here but come on... let’s have some sense.

The panel was independent, none of those people are associated with any of the effected clubs or the board that made the original call. Keep in mind this is not international cricket - can’t just have independent panels not involved in the comp at all waiting in the wings.

Then you say crick vic should fix the ship when the panel has decided to follow cric vic’s rules advice and that’s the decision you don’t like? Make your mind up!

To criticise the comp for taking too long is also a bit rich - not sure if you have noticed but people are dealing with more important issues at the moment like how to make a living / protect their mental health during these unprecedented times.

As most of the people On here have said this is the sensible result and we should all move on.
 
Muppet said:
Don’t often post on here but come on... let’s have some sense.

The panel was independent, none of those people are associated with any of the effected clubs or the board that made the original call. Keep in mind this is not international cricket - can’t just have independent panels not involved in the comp at all waiting in the wings.

Then you say crick vic should fix the ship when the panel has decided to follow cric vic’s rules advice and that’s the decision you don’t like? Make your mind up!

To criticise the comp for taking too long is also a bit rich - not sure if you have noticed but people are dealing with more important issues at the moment like how to make a living / protect their mental health during these unprecedented times.

As most of the people On here have said this is the sensible result and we should all move on.
Click to expand...
Previous administrator has had a issue with at least 3 of the clubs involved which is a fact. Conflicted. Luckily im an arms length supporter no longer directly involved with any club. But i can say that this comp lacks any leadership & won’t be around for long. New People running the place looked to leave the comp... & you can take that to the bank. They’ll deny it but its the truth.
& again I could care less who gets the shield it just typical of the mess. This comp is more focussed on womens cricket than anything else. Give it up boys, give it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top