The Future of the Aussie Test Side

Re: The Future of the Aussie Test Side

That is true that Krezja needs to work on his game but he has more potential than Hauritz does. He has a lot to learn and needs to get a lot of bowling under his belt. He needs to realise that when the ball is turning (like it was in Perth) that he needs to bowl a fuller length so the batsmen can't play him off the wicket.

He needs to eliminate that loose short ball out of his game. He needs variation, he needs an arm ball. No finger spinner can call themself a strike bowler without an arm ball and it would serve him well as he's a big turner of the ball with his standard delivery.

It was very dissapointing to see him not bowl with variation and not bowl a full length.


On the pace side of things, average bowlers bowl accurate, great bowlers bowl accurate and move the ball off the straight. Lee got wickets with his extra pace which he has now lost, he is too short to move the ball off the seam and he doesn't swing the ball.
Johnson bowls offcutters that leave the right hander off the pitch so he stays in the side.
Siddle isn't ready yet, he is in the same category as Lee, exactly.

Bollinger is the best state bowler of the last few years and is definatly a test player, a great left arm swing bowler who is tall enough to hit the wicket hard enough to get seam movement.
Hilfenhaus is wonderfully skilled, right arm swing bowler who would take a lot more wickets if he bowled a fuller length with the new ball and when it's swinging. He is accurate and is ready for test cricket.
Lets get some bowlers in who can move the ball and start taking some wickets and get rid of the muppet pacemen who bowl dead straight and put just enough pace on the ball to make it easier for opposition batsmen to hit.
Good to see Hilfy and Bollinger in rushed into the test squad, best they debut here and get some expierence because we must use them in the ashes..
 
Re: The Future of the Aussie Test Side

gbatman;298157 said:
That is true that Krezja needs to work on his game but he has more potential than Hauritz does. He has a lot to learn and needs to get a lot of bowling under his belt. He needs to realise that when the ball is turning (like it was in Perth) that he needs to bowl a fuller length so the batsmen can't play him off the wicket.

He needs to eliminate that loose short ball out of his game. He needs variation, he needs an arm ball. No finger spinner can call themself a strike bowler without an arm ball and it would serve him well as he's a big turner of the ball with his standard delivery.

It was very dissapointing to see him not bowl with variation and not bowl a full length.


On the pace side of things, average bowlers bowl accurate, great bowlers bowl accurate and move the ball off the straight. Lee got wickets with his extra pace which he has now lost, he is too short to move the ball off the seam and he doesn't swing the ball.
Johnson bowls offcutters that leave the right hander off the pitch so he stays in the side.
Siddle isn't ready yet, he is in the same category as Lee, exactly.

Bollinger is the best state bowler of the last few years and is definatly a test player, a great left arm swing bowler who is tall enough to hit the wicket hard enough to get seam movement.
Hilfenhaus is wonderfully skilled, right arm swing bowler who would take a lot more wickets if he bowled a fuller length with the new ball and when it's swinging. He is accurate and is ready for test cricket.
Lets get some bowlers in who can move the ball and start taking some wickets and get rid of the muppet pacemen who bowl dead straight and put just enough pace on the ball to make it easier for opposition batsmen to hit.
Good to see Hilfy and Bollinger in rushed into the test squad, best they debut here and get some expierence because we must use them in the ashes..
Bolinger isn't in the squad at the moment. Hauritz is.
Krejza isn't a shane warne and is obviously struggling at the elite level......
Hilfenhaus is good at ODI level. Hasn't really been used in tests. If he can prove everyone wrong and bowls at his best then he might be a regular in the test team.
We need Bracken in the team.
 
Re: The Future of the Aussie Test Side

Interesting. I wouldn't play him anyway. I'd rather have Clarke, Symonds and Katich sharing the spin for us.
 
Re: The Future of the Aussie Test Side

Same here Mousey, take a 4 man pace attack, with Clark, Symonds and The Kat doing the spinning duties in Melbourne.

In Sydney, Krejza should definitely play ahead of Hauritz.
 
Re: The Future of the Aussie Test Side

Caesar;297461 said:
Good teams don't have to. Got to have a team worth settling with first.

The upper and middle order is pretty settled now, barring injuries and the potential dropping of Hayden. The bowling lineup is in a state of flux, which is natural given the recent changes. No point in picking a hard and fast lineup merely for the sake of having a stable team - some upheaval is necessary to find the right mix.
True. I take that point on board.

However, If you were to pick a team for the Ashes pick a squad that you need which has a couple of spare players.

I would have

Ponting
Clarke
M Hussey
D Hussey
Hughes
Katich
Hayden
Symonds
Watson
Lee
Johnson
Haddin
Hilfenhaus
Bracken
Krezja
Hauritz

in my squad. They are all youngish and are very talented players.
 
Re: The Future of the Aussie Test Side

you can't put a few average spinners together to make up a good spinner. Did we learn noting from the indian tour...

How can we bowl sides out on the last day with out a front line spinner. The Aussie selectors have once again shown no balls by dropping Krajzer. The state selectors do the same to their spin bowlers too. It's rubbish and goes to show we are a hopeless country at developing spin bowlers.
 
Back
Top