Re: Young Up & Comers
I do think Hauritz will probably be first choice spinner then. I don't see the bowling attack changing that much from what it is now by then unless one of them really lose form in a big way. They seem pretty set for some long careers now, more a question of which one is fit for when. I don't think both the 9 and 10 positions you have described there will both be in the team, one of the bowlers now will be a senior bowler by then and a regular (Bollinger is my prediction).
I like Clarke better at 3 than 4 just to point out there. I think he will be there for quite a while after Ponting retires.
Mitch Marsh is 50/50 for me right now in a prediction situation. I can see him becoming more an ODI specialist, but probably will get a go in a Test if he's lucky enough to find himself a spot.
Just on Smith there, I don't like his batting or bowling at the moment. By 2013 he will definitely either prove his worth or fall back to earth. By then it should be a pretty straightforward choice as to whether he is worth it or not.
It's very hard to predict this far ahead though. Just for fun look back a couple of years worth of threads and you will see comments like 'Stuart Clark will never have any effect', or 'Cameron White will never play cricket for Australia'. They are actual quotes from this site
lethalhughes;405557 said:Wade in all forms please when Haddin retires, kid's a gun.Right now i like the idea of Ronchi in 20 20.Couldnt understand why he wasnt ahead of Haddin in 20 20.I know i might be slaughted for saying this but right now Paine is a good back up keeper and nothing more.I think he does have potential and if he works hard on his game the sky is the limit but no way would Paine be ahead of Haddin whether it be 50 overs or test matches.Australia team after 2013 should look more or so like this:
1.Hughes
2.Khawaja
3.Watson
4.Clarke
5.Mitch Marsh (will play test cricket before he's 22 bookmark it.)
6.Steve SMith( or ofcourse Ferguson at 6)
7. Wade
8.M.Johnson
9.Hazzlewood( Will be about 23 by then, even at the tender age of 19 the kid looks ready or atleast close to ready)
10.Copeland( George/Siddle/Hilfy/Ben ''Cutting throw batting line ups'', could be any of them
11.Boyce( Jon holland ,hey Hauritz may still be the first choice spinner by then)
other contenders are: Hill,White,Marsh( shaun ofcourse), Paine ( GOOD BACKUP),North( might still be in the team on his last leg .Selectors seem to love him.And a few others who are yet to make their domestic debut .
Future looks bright if selectors are up for it and those kids dont fall by the way side.
This is my say for the day.
I do think Hauritz will probably be first choice spinner then. I don't see the bowling attack changing that much from what it is now by then unless one of them really lose form in a big way. They seem pretty set for some long careers now, more a question of which one is fit for when. I don't think both the 9 and 10 positions you have described there will both be in the team, one of the bowlers now will be a senior bowler by then and a regular (Bollinger is my prediction).
I like Clarke better at 3 than 4 just to point out there. I think he will be there for quite a while after Ponting retires.
Mitch Marsh is 50/50 for me right now in a prediction situation. I can see him becoming more an ODI specialist, but probably will get a go in a Test if he's lucky enough to find himself a spot.
Just on Smith there, I don't like his batting or bowling at the moment. By 2013 he will definitely either prove his worth or fall back to earth. By then it should be a pretty straightforward choice as to whether he is worth it or not.
It's very hard to predict this far ahead though. Just for fun look back a couple of years worth of threads and you will see comments like 'Stuart Clark will never have any effect', or 'Cameron White will never play cricket for Australia'. They are actual quotes from this site
