The430king
Member
Re: DVCA: Barclay Shield
Lower Eltham easily. Just missing an opener.
bradfromeltham;343143 said:Plenty
Lower Eltham easily. Just missing an opener.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bradfromeltham;343143 said:Plenty
five80;343123 said:Quick question from an outsider - Who has the strongest batting line up in the DVCA?
The430king;343284 said:Lower Eltham easily. Just missing an opener.
brutal;343486 said:Look at the Stats, they would probablly tell you. Lalor Stars, Lower Eltham and then Research. From 11 innings Research made 2420 runs with a loss of 88 wkts, bowling is another story?
five80;343123 said:Quick question from an outsider - Who has the strongest batting line up in the DVCA?
CricketBox;343359 said:Why wouldn't Luke Poyser open himself this year King?
CricketBox;343360 said:With full sides in it would go Lower Eltham, Plenty and then Stars.
PremiersAgain;338351 said:do you know what i love about north eltham? for a club that has been so disapointing for so long with the amount of juniors they have every year, they would still be one of the most hated clubs in the dvca by the way the conduct themself on and off the field (like big cricket).
If they come up to Barclay Shield they may or may not survive year one but one thing that will happen is they will learn there is a massive difference between being able to gob off in money shield and get away with it and gobbing off to the big boys in Barclay Shield. I sure it will sort the boys from the men.
five80;343123 said:Quick question from an outsider - Who has the strongest batting line up in the DVCA?
get over it;344710 said:Maybe its time to get over the big boys from Barclay mentality, lets face it the last two flags have gone to sides that have come up from Money, and the side that came second this year came up from Money, the gap is rapidly closing, just ask the sides that are getting relegated and haven't been able to get back up. Macleod will be a threat again next year, and who knows North Eltham might surprise a few people.
brutal;343486 said:Look at the Stats, they would probablly tell you. Lalor Stars, Lower Eltham and then Research. From 11 innings Research made 2420 runs with a loss of 88 wkts, bowling is another story?
get over it;344710 said:Maybe its time to get over the big boys from Barclay mentality, lets face it the last two flags have gone to sides that have come up from Money, and the side that came second this year came up from Money, the gap is rapidly closing, just ask the sides that are getting relegated and haven't been able to get back up. Macleod will be a threat again next year, and who knows North Eltham might surprise a few people.
CricketBox;343359 said:Why wouldn't Luke Poyser open himself this year King?
get over it;344710 said:Maybe its time to get over the big boys from Barclay mentality, lets face it the last two flags have gone to sides that have come up from Money, and the side that came second this year came up from Money, the gap is rapidly closing, just ask the sides that are getting relegated and haven't been able to get back up. Macleod will be a threat again next year, and who knows North Eltham might surprise a few people.
PremiersAgain;338351 said:do you know what i love about north eltham? for a club that has been so disapointing for so long with the amount of juniors they have every year, they would still be one of the most hated clubs in the dvca by the way the conduct themself on and off the field (like big cricket).
If they come up to Barclay Shield they may or may not survive year one but one thing that will happen is they will learn there is a massive difference between being able to gob off in money shield and get away with it and gobbing off to the big boys in Barclay Shield. I sure it will sort the boys from the men.
get over it;344710 said:Maybe its time to get over the big boys from Barclay mentality, lets face it the last two flags have gone to sides that have come up from Money, and the side that came second this year came up from Money, the gap is rapidly closing, just ask the sides that are getting relegated and haven't been able to get back up. Macleod will be a threat again next year, and who knows North Eltham might surprise a few people.
There will be no worries with Macleod staying up this season. Eltham will have to recruit well with the loss of Skips and also a battling bowling line up, but im sure they will be fine. So all the pressure is on NEW you have to remember they only just scraped into the finals in Money this year. Sure they had a good run when it counted, but they will have to be more consistant than that it's a whole new game in Barclay and no game is a gimmie up there.five80;345176 said:Here's a question for debate. Where are Macleod at for the upcoming season? I reckon they were a little lucky to stay up this year and only hung on because LP had such a shocker. Would they be favourite to go down or NEW? Anyone think Macleod are good enough to stay up?
get over it;344710 said:Maybe its time to get over the big boys from Barclay mentality, lets face it the last two flags have gone to sides that have come up from Money, and the side that came second this year came up from Money, the gap is rapidly closing, just ask the sides that are getting relegated and haven't been able to get back up. Macleod will be a threat again next year, and who knows North Eltham might surprise a few people.
The430king;344759 said:How can Macleod be a threat again, when they didn't really threaten anyone. All they beat were Riverside, Diamond Creek and Lower Plenty. None of these teams really set the world on fire. Get your facts straight before dribbling this garbage.
get over it;344710 said:Maybe its time to get over the big boys from Barclay mentality, lets face it the last two flags have gone to sides that have come up from Money, and the side that came second this year came up from Money, the gap is rapidly closing, just ask the sides that are getting relegated and haven't been able to get back up. Macleod will be a threat again next year, and who knows North Eltham might surprise a few people.
get over it;345284 said:I notice you say I'm dribbling garbage yet you only go after one point I made. The FACTS are the that clubs that have gone thru money shield are starting to dominate Barclay and my point about Macleod was sound they came up and beat a few sides that they werent supposed to and pushed quite a few others, their seconds were also good and they will be in Barclay for quite a while. While at the same time sides that have been relegated are still languishing in the second division, ie Thomastown, Hurstbridge, Monty and Mill Park. NEW may have snuck up but I still reckon they would beat Eltham convincingly.
get over it;345284 said:I notice you say I'm dribbling garbage yet you only go after one point I made. The FACTS are the that clubs that have gone thru money shield are starting to dominate Barclay and my point about Macleod was sound they came up and beat a few sides that they werent supposed to and pushed quite a few others, their seconds were also good and they will be in Barclay for quite a while. While at the same time sides that have been relegated are still languishing in the second division, ie Thomastown, Hurstbridge, Monty and Mill Park. NEW may have snuck up but I still reckon they would beat Eltham convincingly.
There will be no worries with Macleod staying up this season. Eltham will have to recruit well with the loss of Skips and also a battling bowling line up, but im sure they will be fine. So all the pressure is on NEW you have to remember they only just scraped into the finals in Money this year. Sure they had a good run when it counted, but they will have to be more consistant than that it's a whole new game in Barclay and no game is a gimmie up there.five80;345176 said:Here's a question for debate. Where are Macleod at for the upcoming season? I reckon they were a little lucky to stay up this year and only hung on because LP had such a shocker. Would they be favourite to go down or NEW? Anyone think Macleod are good enough to stay up?
The430king;345450 said:If you read my second post you would see another comment about why these money shield sides coming up were able to do well in Barclay. Before you gob off at me, read everything i've written you goose.
The430king;344759 said:How can Macleod be a threat again, when they didn't really threaten anyone. All they beat were Riverside, Diamond Creek and Lower Plenty. None of these teams really set the world on fire. Get your facts straight before dribbling this garbage.
Just read his post champ you sound like an idiot.get over it;345473 said:Again you aren't disproving my point. Why come on here if you are just going to throw lame insults at someone you dont know. I'm right, no if buts or maybes. I have the facts to back it up. Money shield clubs have won the past 2 flags. What can you say? Try to make it worthwhile this time.
get over it;345284 said:I notice you say I'm dribbling garbage yet you only go after one point I made. The FACTS are the that clubs that have gone thru money shield are starting to dominate Barclay and my point about Macleod was sound they came up and beat a few sides that they werent supposed to and pushed quite a few others, their seconds were also good and they will be in Barclay for quite a while. While at the same time sides that have been relegated are still languishing in the second division, ie Thomastown, Hurstbridge, Monty and Mill Park. NEW may have snuck up but I still reckon they would beat Eltham convincingly.
get over it;345473 said:Again you aren't disproving my point. Why come on here if you are just going to throw lame insults at someone you dont know. I'm right, no if buts or maybes. I have the facts to back it up. Money shield clubs have won the past 2 flags. What can you say? Try to make it worthwhile this time.
get over it;345284 said:I notice you say I'm dribbling garbage yet you only go after one point I made. The FACTS are the that clubs that have gone thru money shield are starting to dominate Barclay and my point about Macleod was sound they came up and beat a few sides that they werent supposed to and pushed quite a few others, their seconds were also good and they will be in Barclay for quite a while. While at the same time sides that have been relegated are still languishing in the second division, ie Thomastown, Hurstbridge, Monty and Mill Park. NEW may have snuck up but I still reckon they would beat Eltham convincingly.
CricketBox;345560 said:Here are some other facts:
Mernda only won becasue of Bakes and Chesto, not because they are a club from Money originally.
Epping won it the year before becasue they were the best side in it, not because they have played in Money Shield before.
Do you think coming from Money Shield gives a team some kind of super power?
The430king;345450 said:If you read my second post you would see another comment about why these money shield sides coming up were able to do well in Barclay. Before you gob off at me, read everything i've written you goose.
Why not im sure you have put worse yourself.get over it;345626 said:Did I say that, dont put your ridiculous statements into my mouth? I said that teams that have come up from Money shield have won the last two flags and other teams are doing well. Are you people that insecure that you need to get this defensive about comments that are nothing but true. Grow up and have a good look at your own competition.
Just read his post champ you sound like an idiot.get over it;345473 said:Again you aren't disproving my point. Why come on here if you are just going to throw lame insults at someone you dont know. I'm right, no if buts or maybes. I have the facts to back it up. Money shield clubs have won the past 2 flags. What can you say? Try to make it worthwhile this time.
get over it;345473 said:Again you aren't disproving my point. Why come on here if you are just going to throw lame insults at someone you dont know. I'm right, no if buts or maybes. I have the facts to back it up. Money shield clubs have won the past 2 flags. What can you say? Try to make it worthwhile this time.
get over it;345473 said:Again you aren't disproving my point. Why come on here if you are just going to throw lame insults at someone you dont know. I'm right, no if buts or maybes. I have the facts to back it up. Money shield clubs have won the past 2 flags. What can you say? Try to make it worthwhile this time.
The430king;346060 said:Simple fact of the matter is Mernda won because they had recruited 3 proven players in Barclay Shield in Bakes, Chesto and Snowy. Lalor Stars made the granny because of Keaysy, a barclay shield champion, and some very good batting during the year. Epping won the flag, but they came up from Money shield 7 years ago, it did tae them some time to get there. If you think Macleod had a great year last year, you've got your head under a rock. Simple fact is if Money Shield clubs want to stay in barclay for an extended period, they need to recruit players that have been in barclay shield and been succesful, as that's what Mernda and Stars have done. If you have a look at Mernda's team, if they lost there 3 stars, they would struggle as they don't have depth and a Lalor Stars player has told me the same thing.
CricketBox;345560 said:Here are some other facts:
Mernda only won becasue of Bakes and Chesto, not because they are a club from Money originally.
Epping won it the year before becasue they were the best side in it, not because they have played in Money Shield before.
Do you think coming from Money Shield gives a team some kind of super power?
one shot;346066 said:is there many teams in any comp that could still be competitive if they lost there star players, good cricket teams and era's i believe are built on making your mid range players better over time as most teams have 3 stars.