Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Young Willi Lad;322517 said:For me it depends on which spinner they play.
If McGain plays then McDonald should bat at 6.
If Hauritz plays then North to bat at 6.
This is because if Hauritz plays, he is going to need some help in the spin bowling department. But as i think McGain will play then i think McDonald will bat at 6 and add 10 overs an innings of handy medium pace.
Mousey;322542 said:Good point, but couldn't one argue that Clarke and Katich can help Hauritz and McDonald should play anyway?
namdarb;322582 said:McDonald may not bowl quick but geez he bowled some very tight spells in his debut test match.
My thoughts exactly. May have a role to play in the shorter forms but really does not look like a test match player, as well as the fact that you really shouldn't be picking an all-rounder in test cricket just for the sake of picking one.BabyBlues;322492 said:North. McDonald isn't a Test-standard player. Maybe North isn't either, but he's a better shot than Ronnie I reckon.
Ljp86;325570 said:I believe it should be North but the selectors will probably go with McDonald just so they can have an all-rounder in the side. With Australia's batting looky shaky against South Africa in the recent test series, North would shore up the middle order but with McDonals at six it doesn't look as sturdy in my opinion.
el-capitano;327378 said:I'd pick North out of those two because of his batting.
However, another one to look forward to in the future is Callum Ferguson. After his impressive one day efforts, I could see him batting at 6 for us in the test team.![]()
This year: 576 Sheffield Shield runs at 48fmr_13;327892 said:Hm, I'm not too sure how he would go in the test arena.
What are his Shield scores from this year?