A
aussieman
Guest
Why do we need a bowl-off?
with the exception of a final perhaps...
A tie is as exciting as it comes, close action, exciting finish, two-teams unable to be split. Yet, it's been decided we need to have a winner.
Why oh why?
What a farcical ending to a match. Why not just get the two fastest players from each team and make them have a race from one end of the field to the other...it's exactly the same thing.
with the exception of a final perhaps...
A tie is as exciting as it comes, close action, exciting finish, two-teams unable to be split. Yet, it's been decided we need to have a winner.
Why oh why?
What a farcical ending to a match. Why not just get the two fastest players from each team and make them have a race from one end of the field to the other...it's exactly the same thing.
